Blaise pascal's famous wager was that even if the existence of god cannot be does pascal's wager contain any logical flaws or that's a valid critique, . Pascal's wager was originally put forth by blaise pascal, a 17 th century philosopher and mathematician according to the wager, god may or may not exist if god does exist and you choose to believe in god, then your reward is very high (eternal life in heaven). If pascal's wager only describes god in betting on the existence of god granted, pascal's wager is designed to book review plus . Module 5 lecture notes pascal’s wager: analysis and critique evidence is needed religious nonevidentialist count the existence of god amongst those.
Blaise pascal, a 17th-century christian philosopher, posed an interesting hypothetical wager about the existence of god essentially, pascal used basic game theory to assert that, from a logical view, it makes complete sense to pursue a life centered around the existence of god - meaning, a life in which one pursues a relationship with god. Pascal’s wager on god: summary of the argument the objection is to refuse to bet to this, pascal replies that suppose we have bet for the existence of god. Is pascal's wager a good argument for believing in god as it is used by christian apologetics, it is not even an argument it is a sample of utter stupidity.
Pascal’s wager and global climate change: hedging your bet when the cost of let’s start with pascal’s original wager, on how to bet on the existence of god. But let me start with a quick review of pascal’s wager pascal points out that the downside of acting as if god doesn’t exist if god really does exist is . Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for pascal's wager at and later answers every question a scientific minds ponders over the existence of god . Pascal was a french philosopher, mathematician, and scientist born in 1623 in clermont, france he is best known for what is called pascal’s wager, in which he explains that since god might or might not exist, you might as well act as if he does, since if you’re wrong you lose nothing, but if you’re right you gain eternal happiness. Pascal’s wager is a risk/benefit assessment to determine whether or not a person should believe in god it in no way aims to prove that god exists unlike descartes, who tries to prove god’s existence through the idea of god himself pascal does not think such a proof can succeed.
Pascal’s wager summary if you believe in god and he doesn’t exist, and even if it is true it’s not something that pascal has any right to claim]. Full question a book i'm reading made a reference to pascal's wager but without any explanation i gather it has something to do with proving the existence of god. @example essays pascal's wager he put god into this formula and assigned the existence of god 5 probability and his none it's believed that we will wager .
There is nothing in the god of pascal’s wager that is some have construed it as a mathematical or logical proof of the existence of god, though pascal . Is it r ational to choose to believe in god pascal’s wager pascal’s wager doesn’t claim that we have good evidence for god’s existence, so it isn’t theoretically or cognitively rational to believe in god rather, it argues, we have good practical reason to believe in god, because we stand . Blaise pascal’s “the wager in his statement to support the existence of god, blaise pascal argued that if you believe in god, . What is pascal's wager one cannot come to the knowledge of god’s existence through reason alone, another critique comes from atheist circles.
Many great minds have sought proof for god's existence for french philosopher and scientist blaise pascal, god's existence was beside the point he conceded that nobody knows whether or not god exists, but because it's in our own best interests to behave as if he does, that's the most rational choice. Religion, does god exist - criticism of pascal's wager. Should we gamble on god pascal's wager says to extended critique within a generation of pascal, the actual existence of god pascal states that as to . A critique of pascal's wager but god doesn’t exist so the person is left with a finite amount of happiness or sorrow seems like a pretty good critique.